A study published this month in the International Journal of Toxicology, the official journal of the American College of Toxicology, provides the strongest clinical evidence to date supporting the theory that mercury exposure is tied to autism.
The study, co-authored by Mark Blaxill, a director of Safe Minds, suggests a biological mechanism for the hypothesis first advanced by Safe Minds that autism is a form of mercury poisoning and that exposure to the mercury-based preservative thimerosal in vaccines has likely caused neurological damage to thousands of children.
Blaxill, along with co-investigators Amy Holmes, MD and Boyd Haley, PhD, assessed mercury exposure levels among 94 autistic children and 45 normally developing controls. They found higher pre- and postnatal exposures in the autistic group. Then they took a novel approach to measuring mercury distribution in the study subjects during infancy: they collected the first lock of baby hair that had been taken years earlier from each child to determine its mercury content. In a result that appears surprising at first, they found that the autistic hair mercury levels were only a fraction of the controls'.
"Our findings might seem counter-intuitive," says Blaxill, "but if you take into account the higher exposures of the autistic children, you quickly see that these reduced hair levels suggest that less mercury was being excreted by these babies. This is because mercury must be in the blood in order to be taken up by the hair follicle, and mercury must be in the blood in order to be eliminated from the body. If it's not in the hair, then it is not in the blood. And if it's not in the blood to be eliminated, more mercury is retained and available to cause neurological damage in infants who subsequently develop autism."
One finding of the study that will be sure to draw attention is the relatively high levels of mercury in the hair of normal infants. These levels appear to be a direct result of the number of mercury-containing amalgam fillings in the mother, as well as the mother's fish consumption, during pregnancy. Many popular fish species contain high levels of mercury. These results appear consistent with the notion that mercury levels in women of child-bearing age are already dangerously high. Thimerosal-containing infant vaccines can then push vulnerable children over the edge.
"This study provides the clearest proof we have seen so far," said Sallie Bernard, executive director of Safe Minds, "that small differences in mercury exposure and detoxification ability can drive huge differences in the brain development of small children. Recent studies sponsored by vaccine health officials that have attempted to reassure parents about the safety of so-called "low dose" mercury exposures from vaccines have completely failed to assess individual sensitivity to this neurotoxin. It only takes one child in 100 to have reduced excretion capacity and you can have an epidemic of neurological disease on your hands."
http://www.safeminds.org.
Will vaccines help or kill your children?
Um, exuse me? They proved that non-autistic children have higher levels of mercury in their hair, and somehow this means that mercury causes autism? Does anyone else smell a non-sequiter? They PROPOSED a mechanism of non-excretion, but with the information you provide, they did not prove it, or even support it by any stretch of the immagination. They didn't test the non-excretion hypothesis, they only found higher levels of mercury in non-autistic kiddos. One might even argue that the LACK of vaccines causes autism. This is an appaling case of making the data fit your pre-determined conclusions.
Will vaccines help or kill your children?
it is for you to choose.
Will vaccines help or kill your children?
Wasn't that recent. Articles appeared in 2003/4.
Will vaccines help or kill your children?
Well they won't kill my son because we don't vaccinate him. Do your research before you make any choices.
www.nvic.com
www.thinktwice.com
www.909shot.com
www.mothering.com
Will vaccines help or kill your children?
I think that they have potential to kill. There are many adverse vaccine reactions that go unreported. Also many SIDS occur shortly after vaccinations, but the CDC would never own up to any of that. Anyways there are too many toxic substances in vaccinations, and I will not be taking that risk with my children. My right to waive vaccines will be used!
http://www.thinktwice.com/
http://www.nvic.org/state-site/state-exe...
http://www.vaclib.org/index.htm
http://www.mercola.com/article/vaccines/...
http://www.informedchoice.info/cocktail....
http://www.vaccines.bizland.com/links.ht...
Will vaccines help or kill your children?
There really is nothing good that a mercury compound can do for a child's brain. It should not be debated, just banned.
Do we really need some large scale study when it has been known for over a century the mercury is a cumulative neurotoxic metal.
Forget Autism, its bad for the brain peroid.
There is a lot of unethical and deceptive pressure by the drug companies to force parents to get Hepititis B vaccinations. The schools will out an out lie (or maybe they were lied to themselfs) about the laws regarding required vaccinations.
The vaccine for Lyme disease was out for two years before they realized it actually caused lyme disease. It is good to wait a couple of years before using a new vaccine.
But just like Microsoft selling defective software, drug companies that tout products which cause health issues later make more money with a defective product than a safe one.
No comments:
Post a Comment